Activity type | Activity value | Assay description | Source | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Efficacy (functional) | = 64 % | Percentage analgesic efficacy of the compound when compared to morphine | ChEMBL. | 15537361 |
Efficacy (functional) | = 64 % | Percentage analgesic efficacy of the compound when compared to morphine | ChEMBL. | 15537361 |
Latency (functional) | = 16.7 s | Analgesic activity of the compound was evaluated in mouse hot-plate test; expressed as licking latency after 30 min of treatment at a dose of 20 ug intracerebroventricularly | ChEMBL. | 15537361 |
Latency (functional) | = 16.7 s | Analgesic activity of the compound was evaluated in mouse hot-plate test; expressed as licking latency after 30 min of treatment at a dose of 20 ug intracerebroventricularly | ChEMBL. | 15537361 |
Latency (functional) | = 17.1 s | Analgesic activity of the compound was evaluated in mouse hot-plate test; expressed as licking latency after 45 min of treatment at a dose of 20 ug intracerebroventricularly | ChEMBL. | 15537361 |
Latency (functional) | = 17.1 s | Analgesic activity of the compound was evaluated in mouse hot-plate test; expressed as licking latency after 45 min of treatment at a dose of 20 ug intracerebroventricularly | ChEMBL. | 15537361 |
Latency (functional) | = 21.8 s | Analgesic activity of the compound was evaluated in mouse hot-plate test; expressed as licking latency after 15 min of treatment at a dose of 20 ug intracerebroventricularly | ChEMBL. | 15537361 |
Latency (functional) | = 21.8 s | Analgesic activity of the compound was evaluated in mouse hot-plate test; expressed as licking latency after 15 min of treatment at a dose of 20 ug intracerebroventricularly | ChEMBL. | 15537361 |
Many chemical entities in TDR Targets come from high-throughput screenings with whole cells or tissue samples, and not all assayed compounds have been tested against a single a single target protein, probably because they get ruled out during screening process. Even if these compounds may have not been of interest in the original screening, they may come as interesting leads for other screening assays. Furthermore, we may be able to propose drug-target associations using chemical similarities and network patterns.
1 literature reference was collected for this gene.